Webster defines abstract as: a.considered apart from a certain instance, b.expressing a good in addition to the object or c. having only intrinsic form with little if any pictorial representation. Put simply; taking an item and emphasizing its core fundamentalness. All three definitions effortlessly fit abstract painting in showing, telling, drawing and painting the essence of the thing without actually depicting the thing itself.
How does an abstract painter arrive at an abstract design? Many stated which they started with a representational motif, that the motif was something readily identifiable. They dissected the motif as we say, searching for the bare bones, the essence of the object. They expressed this essence with colorful shapes, some beautiful, some drab, and some just plain ugly.
In any type of painting the artist is making a statement. It’s easy to state pretty pink flowers in a representational painting. What the abstract artist has to state should be said with his/her simple means; brush marks, color and interesting shapes. Also, since color is arbitrary, color reaches the artist’s whim, and may or may not be pretty and has nothing related to the painting’s success https://joomlamarketingtips.com/large-abstract-paintings-painting-for-beginners/.
To make a meaningful statement with no recognizable subject is daunting. It’s not really a matter of simply looking and drawing. He or she must use almost all their wiles to interact us in dialog with their art, being limited, or we should say, unlimited, with unrecognizable shapes and unrelated (to the object) color. The artist must interest and speak to the viewer through form and color.
A poor, wishy washy, pretty pink flower painting says, “Weak, wishy washy pretty pink flowers!” Bright, bold colors, without form and substance in an abstract painting says, “No form and no substance!” Neither painting is successful.
So….. here we stand before the artwork, having no comprehension of abstract art, its purpose and intention. We wish to respond but we’re with no clue. So, we hesitate before the art work, we don’t understand what to state, we don’t answer the color or design, so, we disappear saying, or at least thinking, “That artist should be nuts!” And wondering what the painting was all about. The thing that was its purpose? Was it good art or not?
There are several people that are of the opinion that a painting should be representational to be good art. And if they can not see every hair on the top and every leaf on the tree, then the art is not good. That only is not true. You could prefer the see every hair but that is definitely not an indication of good art.
What guidelines do we’ve in judging abstract paintings merits? The guidelines that representational painters must follow are exactly the same for the abstract painter. The task must have readable values, color harmony and dominance, repetition with variety in shapes, colors and lines, all that relates to good art should also take abstract art.
An accumulation of wild colors and shapes does not always soon add up to good art in abstraction or representational art. A great abstract could be harder to accomplish than representational art as the artist is relying on his imagination and intuition to produce something meaningful and of value. (not necessarily monetary value)
In attempting to understand abstract (non-representational) art, approach it with the concept at heart to simply appreciate what is before you. Sometimes the title will give us a clue about what the painting is about. That helps. Then look and pay attention to how it affects you.
Does the color speak for your requirements? Are you lifted up or cast down by the color? You could have some reaction to a bit of art work, it will move you in some way, perhaps little, perhaps a good deal. Identify what it is. Good art, whether abstract or representational, sets a mood, tells a tale, however subtle, intrigues and interests the viewer, and as a result, each painting should be appreciated alone merits.